- about 8 hours ago @GLCdelivers hosts another successful hospitality suite at #CHPRMS.
about 8 hours ago Reconnected with @anthonycirillo at #CHPRMS hospitality suite hosted by @GLCdelivers.
about 9 hours ago A very Charleston Christmas: http://t.co/nPwaY0ud #chprms
about 11 hours ago At #CHPRMS - dinner at Macintosh.
about 11 hours ago RT @dslenzak: Aimee is on CNN right now. Love it. #chprms
about 11 hours ago Marketing certain women's products can be uncomfortable. Check out how these companies tackled it: http://t.co/U5dX2ZvG #CHPRMS
about 12 hours ago Aimee is on CNN right now. Love it. #chprms
about 12 hours ago Headed out to @StarsRooftop for a great dinner with wonderful staff of Alamance Regional Medical Center! #CHPRMS
about 14 hours ago Great happy hour. Thank you doctor directory. #chprms
about 14 hours ago #chprms is a Happy group! (@ The Cocktail Club w/ 2 others) http://t.co/GVitMnJ4
about 15 hours ago Day 1 at #CHPRMS! Having a good time. Stop by during the conference to see Dean from AVID Design.
about 15 hours ago RT @JarrardInc: A little perspective: 78% of consumers trust online peer recommendations. 14% trust traditional advertising. #chprms
about 15 hours ago RT @JarrardInc: Are social media relevant to your hospital? Hint: 80% of internet users research healthcare online. #chprms
about 15 hours ago RT @heysaturday: Great reminder: please have fun with your campaigns! Being too serious with marketing can come at a price. #chprms
about 15 hours ago .@allgood_b Awesome. I interested in talking to the folks at #chprms. I have an idea after looking at their twitter stream.
about 16 hours ago @FranklinTweets on #hcmktg to women: pick a screen and own it. Don't be afraid to have fun w campaigns #CHPRMS
about 16 hours ago Great reminder: please have fun with your campaigns! Being too serious with marketing can come at a price. #chprms
about 16 hours ago Met Wallie at #chprms http://t.co/Jo4je2LP
about 16 hours ago our @stephenmoegling laying down the gauntlet on mktg to women: how will your nxt campaign use story building? #CHPRMS #hcmktg
about 16 hours ago Pick a screen & own it. #chprms
about 16 hours ago @dandunlop Yes, looking forward to the Wallies. #chprms
about 16 hours ago Missing our colleagues Theckla Sterrett and Theckla Pope who are livin' it up at #chprms
about 16 hours ago @RadioMediaGuy #chprms is the best!
about 16 hours ago How to think about digital strategy. #chprms http://t.co/Q1TPKRLv
about 16 hours ago So easy, a walrus can use it. See for yourself at the Frogman Interactive booth at #CHPRMS #touchscreen #kiosk #wallie http://t.co/z01Y0Z9d
about 16 hours ago Move from managing your web site to managing your web footprint. @greystone session at #chprms #hcmktg
about 16 hours ago Martin agency reworked their creative brief to ensure storytelling is part of the creative dev. process. Interesting to see. #chprms
about 16 hours ago Figure out what is the audience really interested in? #chprms
about 16 hours ago Story build with interaction. Keep the convo going. #chprms
about 16 hours ago We need to shift from story telling to story building. #chprms
about 16 hours ago Are social media relevant to your hospital? Hint: 80% of internet users research healthcare online. #chprms
about 16 hours ago Best brand at marketing to women? Harley Davidson tells women its their time to ride with garage parties and ads. @FranklinTweets #CHPRMS
about 16 hours ago RT @allgood_b: Franklin St presentation at #chprms check out http://t.co/JDpypt51 to see the funny ads. http://t.co/shLjxztc
about 16 hours ago Branding is no longer a one way convo. #chprms
about 16 hours ago "In healthcare, the obvious things aren't so obvious." @FranklinTweets #CHPRMS
about 16 hours ago Franklin St presentation at #chprms check out http://t.co/JDpypt51 to see the funny ads. http://t.co/shLjxztc
about 16 hours ago A little perspective: 78% of consumers trust online peer recommendations. 14% trust traditional advertising. #chprms
about 17 hours ago Is social media a fad, or a lasting transformation akin to the industrial revolution? #chprms
about 17 hours ago @CCdmcrae: Is the patient experience reflecting or supporting your brand? Great presentation from the Baird Group at #CHPRMS @KristinBaird
about 17 hours ago Incorporating the patient experience into interactive communications. Rich storytelling. #CHPRMS #WallieAward2011 http://t.co/zDxfFJCZ
about 17 hours ago K. Baird giving a great talk about the importance of the pt experience at every touchpoint! Part of branding/mktg you cannot ignore! #chprms
about 18 hours ago RT @amandabrasier: "We call it heart-wiring." Kristen Baird describes how to change #custserv for the better. #CHPRMS
about 18 hours ago Is the patient experience reflecting or supporting your brand? Great presentation from the Baird Group at #CHPRMS
about 18 hours ago @mspeir hope to meet you at #chprms
about 18 hours ago RT @JarrardInc: In a crisis, feed the beast (the media) or the beast will feed on you. #chprms #crisisplanning
about 18 hours ago RT @JarrardInc: Hints: Stock your crisis command center with spare chargers for phones, tablets, etc. And take a shower! #chprms #hcmktg
about 18 hours ago RT @mspeir: Lessons: review comms plan, memorize hospital photo/video policies, always do what's in best interest/care of pts #CHPRMS #hcmktg
about 18 hours ago RT @amandabrasier: "We call it heart-wiring." Kristen Baird describes how to change #custserv for the better. #CHPRMS
about 18 hours ago RT @vlsmds: General session about the movie theater tragedy in Colorado; #hcmktg peeps, review your communication plan! #chprms
about 18 hours ago RT @vlsmds: "All consumers know is what they experience" - Patient Experience w/ Kristin Baird #hcmktg #chprms
about 18 hours ago "All consumers know is what they experience" - Patient Experience w/ Kristin Baird #hcmktg #chprms
about 18 hours ago Moment of truth: The moment when your patient decides if you are what you say you are. #chprms
about 18 hours ago RT @amandabrasier: "We call it heart-wiring." Kristen Baird describes how to change #custserv for the better. #CHPRMS
about 18 hours ago You are welcome! And deserving. RT @vlsmds: “@dandunlop: 10 People to Meet at #CHPRMS this Week http://t.co/y8e5OJxd” Thank you!
about 18 hours ago RT @ContrastCreativ: Just wrapped a fantastic #CHPRMS roundtable lunch sponsored by Contrast Creative...onto the next session!
about 18 hours ago "We call it heart-wiring." Kristen Baird describes how to change #custserv for the better. #CHPRMS
about 18 hours ago Just wrapped a fantastic #CHPRMS roundtable lunch sponsored by Contrast Creative...onto the next session!
about 18 hours ago "Your brand is a promise," said KristinBaird #chprms
about 19 hours ago Our booth at the #CHPRMS Fall Conference in Charleston. Stop by and see us :) http://t.co/cIllQH1I
about 19 hours ago Looking at Pinterest and Instagram in a new way thanks to @heysaturday round table at #chprms #hcmktg
about 20 hours ago RT @ContrastCreativ: Be sure to come visit the CC team at our #CHPRMS! #createdbyCC http://t.co/MVwBRZar
about 20 hours ago Great #CHPRMS presentation from the @DoctorsAugusta & @HealthONEsystem marketing teams on Issues Management!
about 20 hours ago Great opening session at #chprms on crisis planning w/ stories about Dark Knight shooting and a student with flesh eating bacteria. WOW!
about 20 hours ago RT @mspeir: Lessons: review comms plan, memorize hospital photo/video policies, always do what's in best interest/care of pts #CHPRMS #hcmktg
about 20 hours ago Lessons: review comms plan, memorize hospital photo/video policies, always do what's in best interest/care of pts #CHPRMS #hcmktg
about 21 hours ago General session about the movie theater tragedy in Colorado; #hcmktg peeps, review your communication plan! #chprms
about 21 hours ago Grt keynote on crisis planning: HCA Denver on Dark Knight shooting +Doctors Augusta on student w flesh-eating disease #CHPRMS #hcmktg
about 21 hours ago RT @mspeir: RT @JarrardInc: In a crisis, feed the beast (the media) or the beast will feed on you. #chprms #hcmktg
about 21 hours ago Hints: Stock your crisis command center with spare chargers for phones, tablets, etc. And take a shower! #chprms #hcmktg
about 21 hours ago Do you have extra cell phone chargers in your command center for times of crisis? #chprms
about 21 hours ago RT @dandunlop: Thanks for the RT! RT @lkafle: 10 People to Meet at CHPRMS this Week http://t.co/cpumAeZp #chprms #hcmktg
about 21 hours ago Very interesting presentation about crisis management within your hospital at the first session at #CHPRMS
about 21 hours ago RT @JarrardInc: In a crisis, feed the beast (the media) or the beast will feed on you. #chprms #hcmktg
about 22 hours ago RT @JarrardInc: In a crisis, feed the beast (the media) or the beast will feed on you. #chprms #crisisplanning
about 22 hours ago RT @JarrardInc: Hospital communications perspectives from Dark Knight theater mass shooting tragedy: media calls every 15 seconds #chprms
about 22 hours ago In a crisis, feed the beast (the media) or the beast will feed on you. #chprms #crisisplanning
about 22 hours ago RT @ContrastCreativ: Good morning #CHPRMS attendees! Be sure & visit the #ContrastCreative & enter our give away! http://t.co/CPmcsnnu
about 22 hours ago Top Ten places to visit while at #CHPRMS in Charleston: http://t.co/v14VcdOV http://t.co/v14VcdOV via @ContrastCreativ
about 22 hours ago Listening to hospital communications perspectives from Dark Knight theater mass shooting tragedy: media calls every 15 seconds #chprms
about 22 hours ago Interested in discussing online reputation management, ratinging sites, and local search in healthcare? #chprms
about 22 hours ago At opening #chprms kickoff. Looking forward to a great conference!
about 22 hours ago @topfloorstudio Carolina's healthcare public relations & marketing society #chprms
about 22 hours ago Great morning seeing folks at the kick offs at #chprms
about 22 hours ago @dandunlop You're welcome. Will you be at #CHPRMS later this week?
about 22 hours ago Thanks for the RT! RT @lkafle: 10 People to Meet at CHPRMS this Week http://t.co/cpumAeZp #chprms #hcmktg
about 23 hours ago Showcasing way-finding to improve patient experience via our touchscreen kiosk at #CHPRMS. Come see it (or us)! http://t.co/fdFw9TYY
about 23 hours ago Good morning #CHPRMS attendees! Be sure & visit the #ContrastCreative & enter our give away! http://t.co/CPmcsnnu
about 23 hours ago Good morning #CHPRMS peeps! Stop by our booth ... #mediatraining #moonpies
about 23 hours ago Good morning Charleston! http://t.co/8mvq5Sjk Looking forward to a great first day at #chprms
about 23 hours ago #chprms conference! (@ Francis Marion Hotel) http://t.co/wkBbciFU
7 Aralık 2012 Cuma
CHPRMS Conference Day One Twitter Activity & Transcript
To contact us Click HERE
Here's the Twitter Transcript from the first 24 hours of the Fall 2012 CHPRMS Conference (Carolinas Healthcare Public Relations & Marketing Society). But first, a graphic with some stats from the first day's Twitter activity. You can click on the graphic for a better view. The data comes from Hashtracking.com. Enjoy!

To The Purists Who Don't Think That My Daughter's Life Is Enough To Celebrate:
To contact us Click HERE
The Supreme Court has upheld "Obamacare"/the Affordable Care Act. This morning when I woke up and logged on to the internet, I expected to see a few snide or negative comments from the handful of Republicans on my Facebook friends list. To my surprise, they hadn't said a word about it. That would have made for a great morning, if it wasn't for the fact that what I did see was several left-wing, self-identified progressives who were actually angry that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the act. At first, I only saw about two comments like that, so I just ignored it. Then I saw a few more of them. It certainly wasn't the majority of people, but it was coming from some high-profile supposedly "progressive" activists.
The one that pissed me off the most was from Cindy Sheehan.
Sadly, the person on my friends list who shared Sheehan's comment was actually in agreement with it. This privileged Special White Woman Sheehan was an anti-war activist during President Bush's administration whose son was a soldier who died in Iraq. Ever since then, she's been held up as some sort of madonna figure in the eyes of white hipster pseudo-activists even though she didn't give a damn about the war until she lost someone in it. She's done so much white-privileged b.s. that her acolytes and admirers are now almost exclusively white.
Anyway, when I saw the Sheehan comment posted the woman on my friends list (Emma Rosenthal), I simply said that the quote was completely ignorant. Of course, Rosenthal got indignant because she considers Sheehan to be a personal friend of hers (even though she's never once commented on anything Emma has said or even acknowledged it when Rosenthal tags in a post. After I posted my comment, the white privilege got as thick as mud. I've tried to give her food for thought when I see her exhibit a lot of ignorance about people of color issues and her barely concealed transphobia. I put up with a lot of her white privilege fuckery, but today just wasn't the day for that, I guess.
She started getting really condescending and telling me not to talk to her that way when she was spewing out all of these insults directed at me, because I happen to benefit from the Affordable Care Act that she and Sheehan can afford to just dismiss. It got down to her making the really low blow of saying how the ACA wasn't going to cure my "fucking cancer". I was hurt really deep by that, but I just pointed out to her that even a single-payer health care system isn't going to cure my "fucking cancer", because there is no cure for my "fucking cancer". Then she got down to saying that well, she's talked to people of color who don't like the ACA either. After telling her that she doesn't speak for those people, she started using the tone argument and I posted a link to the Derailing for Dummies site. Of course, she became indignant about the ablism in that title, but she had nothing to say about the ablism involved in Sheehan's call for universal health care or "NOTHING".
She de-friended me.
I'm not going to lie. It really hurt me.
I'm the third generation in my family to develop cancer. My grandfather died of it. My mother barely survived it. Several of her siblings have it and I'm still living with it. My doctors have talked to me about how seriously I need to take my family history. Because of our family history, and my relatively young age when my tumor developed, the doctors place my daughter in the category of those who need to screened regularly, even though she's much younger than the usual age when it's recommended.
Can't anyone see how much I had riding on this decision?! Can't everyone see? After all of my life-long struggles to get healthcare, because I've had "pre-existing conditions" my entire life, I was finally able to get Medicare. However, I only got it after several appeals and only because I was considered terminally ill. My daughter isn't sick enough to qualify for it. She's able to get Medicaid, because she's my dependent. However, she's 16 and will soon age out of her eligibility. So what are we to do then?
My partner is working towards a career where he'll be able to get health insurance and hopefully he'll be able to put her on it. However, being able to still get free community cancer screenings in the meanwhile will at least make it possible for us to know if she develops it. If the Supreme Court ruling had excluded any part of the health care act, then we'd be facing a hopeless situation.
My partner is only a little less disabled than I am. Please don't say what you're thinking. I already know. I've been told that I maybe should have partnered with someone who isn't disabled. Well, he wasn't disabled when I met him and even if he was, he's the only person who was willing to love me without reserve. My college sweetheart bailed when I got the lupus diagnosis.
But my current partner is able to work, it looks like his old employer is going to take him back. He worked for FedEx and that was how he wound up with a traumatic brain injury from a dog attack. They're looking for a position for him where he doesn't have to be a driver. FedEx has GREAT health insurance. I mean gold standard health insurance. If my daughter could get on his insurance, our problem would be basically solved. And it's almost within reach.
This ruling changes everything for us. EVERYTHING. The removal of the preexisting condition clause (and the Supreme Court upholding it) means that my daughter could get healthcare through an employer, when she grows up. Before this, she had no shot at ever getting health insurance--not with her family history and her own ADHD and Sickle Cell trait. We've never been able to get a company to insure her, because they could just refuse her.
Damn it! I'm so very angry that someone that I thought was truly an ally just chewed me out and belittled my struggles and couldn't even be happy for my kid for one damn morning. Just one damn morning.
The Supreme Court has upheld "Obamacare"/the Affordable Care Act. This morning when I woke up and logged on to the internet, I expected to see a few snide or negative comments from the handful of Republicans on my Facebook friends list. To my surprise, they hadn't said a word about it. That would have made for a great morning, if it wasn't for the fact that what I did see was several left-wing, self-identified progressives who were actually angry that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the act. At first, I only saw about two comments like that, so I just ignored it. Then I saw a few more of them. It certainly wasn't the majority of people, but it was coming from some high-profile supposedly "progressive" activists.
The one that pissed me off the most was from Cindy Sheehan.
"Like I said before, I refuse to buy shitty, high cost death insurance from private companies. Universal, single-payer healthcare (with holistic coverage) or NOTHING. I don't have insurance today because I can't afford it..and just because Obama says that I must buy it doesn't mean I will be able to afford it tomorrow. FTS."
Sadly, the person on my friends list who shared Sheehan's comment was actually in agreement with it. This privileged Special White Woman Sheehan was an anti-war activist during President Bush's administration whose son was a soldier who died in Iraq. Ever since then, she's been held up as some sort of madonna figure in the eyes of white hipster pseudo-activists even though she didn't give a damn about the war until she lost someone in it. She's done so much white-privileged b.s. that her acolytes and admirers are now almost exclusively white.
Anyway, when I saw the Sheehan comment posted the woman on my friends list (Emma Rosenthal), I simply said that the quote was completely ignorant. Of course, Rosenthal got indignant because she considers Sheehan to be a personal friend of hers (even though she's never once commented on anything Emma has said or even acknowledged it when Rosenthal tags in a post. After I posted my comment, the white privilege got as thick as mud. I've tried to give her food for thought when I see her exhibit a lot of ignorance about people of color issues and her barely concealed transphobia. I put up with a lot of her white privilege fuckery, but today just wasn't the day for that, I guess.
She started getting really condescending and telling me not to talk to her that way when she was spewing out all of these insults directed at me, because I happen to benefit from the Affordable Care Act that she and Sheehan can afford to just dismiss. It got down to her making the really low blow of saying how the ACA wasn't going to cure my "fucking cancer". I was hurt really deep by that, but I just pointed out to her that even a single-payer health care system isn't going to cure my "fucking cancer", because there is no cure for my "fucking cancer". Then she got down to saying that well, she's talked to people of color who don't like the ACA either. After telling her that she doesn't speak for those people, she started using the tone argument and I posted a link to the Derailing for Dummies site. Of course, she became indignant about the ablism in that title, but she had nothing to say about the ablism involved in Sheehan's call for universal health care or "NOTHING".
She de-friended me.
I'm not going to lie. It really hurt me.
I'm the third generation in my family to develop cancer. My grandfather died of it. My mother barely survived it. Several of her siblings have it and I'm still living with it. My doctors have talked to me about how seriously I need to take my family history. Because of our family history, and my relatively young age when my tumor developed, the doctors place my daughter in the category of those who need to screened regularly, even though she's much younger than the usual age when it's recommended.
Can't anyone see how much I had riding on this decision?! Can't everyone see? After all of my life-long struggles to get healthcare, because I've had "pre-existing conditions" my entire life, I was finally able to get Medicare. However, I only got it after several appeals and only because I was considered terminally ill. My daughter isn't sick enough to qualify for it. She's able to get Medicaid, because she's my dependent. However, she's 16 and will soon age out of her eligibility. So what are we to do then?
My partner is working towards a career where he'll be able to get health insurance and hopefully he'll be able to put her on it. However, being able to still get free community cancer screenings in the meanwhile will at least make it possible for us to know if she develops it. If the Supreme Court ruling had excluded any part of the health care act, then we'd be facing a hopeless situation.
My partner is only a little less disabled than I am. Please don't say what you're thinking. I already know. I've been told that I maybe should have partnered with someone who isn't disabled. Well, he wasn't disabled when I met him and even if he was, he's the only person who was willing to love me without reserve. My college sweetheart bailed when I got the lupus diagnosis.
But my current partner is able to work, it looks like his old employer is going to take him back. He worked for FedEx and that was how he wound up with a traumatic brain injury from a dog attack. They're looking for a position for him where he doesn't have to be a driver. FedEx has GREAT health insurance. I mean gold standard health insurance. If my daughter could get on his insurance, our problem would be basically solved. And it's almost within reach.
This ruling changes everything for us. EVERYTHING. The removal of the preexisting condition clause (and the Supreme Court upholding it) means that my daughter could get healthcare through an employer, when she grows up. Before this, she had no shot at ever getting health insurance--not with her family history and her own ADHD and Sickle Cell trait. We've never been able to get a company to insure her, because they could just refuse her.
Damn it! I'm so very angry that someone that I thought was truly an ally just chewed me out and belittled my struggles and couldn't even be happy for my kid for one damn morning. Just one damn morning.
Today's Lesson on How to Rid Society of People with Disabilities
To contact us Click HERE
Just when you think that you've heard all of the ways that the USA tries to eliminate people with disabilities, the USA comes up with another strategy to catch more of us in the net. Today's atrocity can be read about here:
I have an incurable cancer, but these days lots of folks like me and others with advanced stage cancers can go on to live decades beyond diagnosis IF WE RECEIVE THE PROPER TREATMENT.
In order for me to get it, my partner and I had to forgo any state-recognized marriage. Cindi Davis is married with a (modest) home. It sounds like she's stuck in the same situation that I faced. She's not going to be able to get Medicaid without selling all they have. The state expects the person to use all of your resources before it will even consider letting you into the program.
If she was pregnant, she might qualify for a Medicaid program in some states, but not all. Of course, getting pregnant while you're in cancer treatment is disastrous, ill-advised, life-threatening. So, she's stuck.
Cindi and her husband tried to hold on to some sense of stability by continuing to make payments on their house, despite having to bear the cost of her needed treatments at the same time. The bank could have accepted the payments that they tried to make. They could suspend their payments for a period of time and just tack on interest.
Wells Fargo could work with the Davis family, still make money off of the loan and allow the family to stay in their home. But they don't want that. Instead, they're foreclosing on them. If the succeed, it will mean that all of the payments that the Davis' have already paid would be money down the drain. The bank would have their previously paid payments and the house. Doesn't that sound like a pretty sweet deal for the bank? I think so! It's unconscionable and the Davis family would be homeless, but why would that be a problem for Wells Fargo? They can simply re-sell the home and sucker yet another family into a mortgage they may never be able to pay off.
The Davis' are already struggling to afford Cindi's treatment. If Wells Fargo takes house, then they won't have to make any more mortgage payments. That should make it easier to afford her treatment right? Wrong! Anyone who has ever had to live out of a motel room for an extended period of time knows how much more expensive it is than when you're in a home.
There's no stove, so you have to eat out for each meal. There's no privacy. "Room Service" comes in whenever they want to. There's no storage space. So, if you have any belongings you're trying to hold on to until you get back on your feet (e.g. your great-great grandmother's dining table, your bed, your pots and pans, a refrigerator, washing machine, stove) they have to be put in storage. Unless you have a friend whose willing to allow you to keep this stuff on their property for an undefined period of time, you will have to pay for storage space. The more stuff you try to hold on to (so that you don't have to spend money buying it all again, if you do find an apartment or house to rent), the more you'll have to pay to store it. If you keep fewer possessions, your storage fee will be cheaper, but it may wind up costing you more in the end, because you'll need money to replace those items if you find another home.
I hope that anyone reading this will now understand how easy it is for someone to find themselves living on the streets for years, just because you or your partner made the mistake of getting sick in the United States of Hellmerica.
Just when you think that you've heard all of the ways that the USA tries to eliminate people with disabilities, the USA comes up with another strategy to catch more of us in the net. Today's atrocity can be read about here:
Cindi Silvers Davis and her husband, have tried very hard to work with their bank, Wells Fargo, but they say they have been mislead, they have been treated poorly, and now Wells Fargo is trying to put an advanced stage cancer victim out on the street.
I have an incurable cancer, but these days lots of folks like me and others with advanced stage cancers can go on to live decades beyond diagnosis IF WE RECEIVE THE PROPER TREATMENT.
In order for me to get it, my partner and I had to forgo any state-recognized marriage. Cindi Davis is married with a (modest) home. It sounds like she's stuck in the same situation that I faced. She's not going to be able to get Medicaid without selling all they have. The state expects the person to use all of your resources before it will even consider letting you into the program.
If she was pregnant, she might qualify for a Medicaid program in some states, but not all. Of course, getting pregnant while you're in cancer treatment is disastrous, ill-advised, life-threatening. So, she's stuck.
Cindi and her husband tried to hold on to some sense of stability by continuing to make payments on their house, despite having to bear the cost of her needed treatments at the same time. The bank could have accepted the payments that they tried to make. They could suspend their payments for a period of time and just tack on interest.
Wells Fargo could work with the Davis family, still make money off of the loan and allow the family to stay in their home. But they don't want that. Instead, they're foreclosing on them. If the succeed, it will mean that all of the payments that the Davis' have already paid would be money down the drain. The bank would have their previously paid payments and the house. Doesn't that sound like a pretty sweet deal for the bank? I think so! It's unconscionable and the Davis family would be homeless, but why would that be a problem for Wells Fargo? They can simply re-sell the home and sucker yet another family into a mortgage they may never be able to pay off.
The Davis' are already struggling to afford Cindi's treatment. If Wells Fargo takes house, then they won't have to make any more mortgage payments. That should make it easier to afford her treatment right? Wrong! Anyone who has ever had to live out of a motel room for an extended period of time knows how much more expensive it is than when you're in a home.
There's no stove, so you have to eat out for each meal. There's no privacy. "Room Service" comes in whenever they want to. There's no storage space. So, if you have any belongings you're trying to hold on to until you get back on your feet (e.g. your great-great grandmother's dining table, your bed, your pots and pans, a refrigerator, washing machine, stove) they have to be put in storage. Unless you have a friend whose willing to allow you to keep this stuff on their property for an undefined period of time, you will have to pay for storage space. The more stuff you try to hold on to (so that you don't have to spend money buying it all again, if you do find an apartment or house to rent), the more you'll have to pay to store it. If you keep fewer possessions, your storage fee will be cheaper, but it may wind up costing you more in the end, because you'll need money to replace those items if you find another home.
I hope that anyone reading this will now understand how easy it is for someone to find themselves living on the streets for years, just because you or your partner made the mistake of getting sick in the United States of Hellmerica.
Being Poor Doesn't Mean You're Stupid or Wasteful
To contact us Click HERE
I saw this on Facebook today and started thinking about my childhood.

My mom had done things "right". She was a married church-going mom with 4 kids. She sewed most of our clothes and cooked every meal from scratch. When I was 8, my dad got a great job offer to transfer to a new city. Unfortunately, the bastard used that opportunity to tell his wife he'd been having an affair and was leaving us behind.
My mom found a job, but had to work overtime just to keep the lights on. Our house went into foreclosure and we moved into a rental.
She never took the welfare cash, but did apply for food stamps. And why the hell shouldn't she?! She'd done what society says a woman was supposed to do, but still got screwed. Food stamps didn't enable us to get the sort of food that we used to eat when my dad was around, but it kept us from starving.
My mom kept seeking better work. She got a job at Marshall's and the employee discount allowed her to buy me clothes nice enough to avoid getting teased. My brothers were so tall that they wore sizes that aren't carried at discount stores.
We practically stalked the local second-hand stores. If you've never been to one, you'd probably be surprised just how much brand new stuff you can find. Some of the stuff still had the original store tags on them.
As an adult, I'm in a better financial state, but I still the second-hand stores are my first stop when I'm looking for clothes. I can't tell you the last time I bought a shirt for more than $10. My daughter bought her gown for the homecoming dance for five bucks and it was prettier than any of the stuff we saw at Macy's.
I saw this on Facebook today and started thinking about my childhood.

My mom had done things "right". She was a married church-going mom with 4 kids. She sewed most of our clothes and cooked every meal from scratch. When I was 8, my dad got a great job offer to transfer to a new city. Unfortunately, the bastard used that opportunity to tell his wife he'd been having an affair and was leaving us behind.
My mom found a job, but had to work overtime just to keep the lights on. Our house went into foreclosure and we moved into a rental.
She never took the welfare cash, but did apply for food stamps. And why the hell shouldn't she?! She'd done what society says a woman was supposed to do, but still got screwed. Food stamps didn't enable us to get the sort of food that we used to eat when my dad was around, but it kept us from starving.
My mom kept seeking better work. She got a job at Marshall's and the employee discount allowed her to buy me clothes nice enough to avoid getting teased. My brothers were so tall that they wore sizes that aren't carried at discount stores.
We practically stalked the local second-hand stores. If you've never been to one, you'd probably be surprised just how much brand new stuff you can find. Some of the stuff still had the original store tags on them.
As an adult, I'm in a better financial state, but I still the second-hand stores are my first stop when I'm looking for clothes. I can't tell you the last time I bought a shirt for more than $10. My daughter bought her gown for the homecoming dance for five bucks and it was prettier than any of the stuff we saw at Macy's.
30 Kasım 2012 Cuma
Woman escorted from Vermont Medical Center at author Robert Whitaker's speaking event
To contact us Click HERE
This blogger, who describes herself on her blog:
"My name is Jeanne and I'm a writer and artist living in VT. I worked as a peer supporter from 1995 til 2010. I survived psychiatric iatrogenic injuries and went on to sue for damages. I'm not a medical professional, if you want to taper from psych chemicals consult a professional. My dream is to have a small solar farm and to continue to be a pain in the neck to the arrogant everywhere."
Was Escorted out of the building when attempting to show support for ["support his work"] Robert Whitaker, author of 'Anatomy of an Epidemic' who was speaking at the Vermont Medical Center, in June 2012.
"She said it was private corporate property and I was trespassing. She said I was causing a disturbance. Then a Nancy T. showed up and got in my face about the situation. I had asked Ms. White for her last name and she was kind enough to tell me, but Ms. T. refused to tell me her name. I got out my handy iphone and asked if I could tape what they were saying to me. They said no. I was rolling up my posters when Ms. White yelled, “Call Security!”"
Take a look at her posters on her blog. Outrageous, that she was removed from the building.
"My name is Jeanne and I'm a writer and artist living in VT. I worked as a peer supporter from 1995 til 2010. I survived psychiatric iatrogenic injuries and went on to sue for damages. I'm not a medical professional, if you want to taper from psych chemicals consult a professional. My dream is to have a small solar farm and to continue to be a pain in the neck to the arrogant everywhere."
Was Escorted out of the building when attempting to show support for ["support his work"] Robert Whitaker, author of 'Anatomy of an Epidemic' who was speaking at the Vermont Medical Center, in June 2012.
"She said it was private corporate property and I was trespassing. She said I was causing a disturbance. Then a Nancy T. showed up and got in my face about the situation. I had asked Ms. White for her last name and she was kind enough to tell me, but Ms. T. refused to tell me her name. I got out my handy iphone and asked if I could tape what they were saying to me. They said no. I was rolling up my posters when Ms. White yelled, “Call Security!”"
Take a look at her posters on her blog. Outrageous, that she was removed from the building.
Whistleblowers and GSK's record $ 3 Billion dollar settlement: Paxil, Wellbutrin, Avandia
To contact us Click HERE
via PR News Wire:
PRESS RELEASE
July 2, 2012, 10:42 a.m. EDT
Whistleblowers played major role in Glaxo case, leading to Glaxo's record settlement
WASHINGTON, July 2, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Two whistleblowers represented by Phillips & Cohen LLP provided the government with overwhelming evidence that was at the heart of the government's case against GlaxoSmithKline GSK +1.34% and the record-setting settlement announced today.
The whistleblowers - Thomas Gerahty, a former senior marketing development manager for Glaxo, and Matthew Burke, a former regional vice president -- provided invaluable insider information that Glaxo was engaging in corrupt nationwide schemes to push sales of Advair, Wellbutrin, Imitrex and other popular prescription drugs for "off-label" (unapproved) uses, that it used improper financial inducements to market its drugs, and that it misrepresented the safety and efficacy of those drugs. Glaxo's illegal practices caused Medicare, Tricare - the healthcare program for the military -- and Medicaid to incur huge losses.
The civil settlement of Gerahty and Burke's whistleblower case and a separate whistleblower lawsuit filed in Colorado total $1.017 billion out of total settlement. It is the largest civil, False Claims Act (whistleblower) settlement on record. (Two other whistleblower lawsuits that alleged another improper practice concerning Advair marketing settled for $25 million, for a total of $1.042 billion paid under the settlement agreement for the four whistleblower cases.)
Gerahty, Burke and Phillips & Cohen worked closely with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston and the Justice Department since they filed their "qui tam" (whistleblower) case in early 2003 in Boston's federal district court.
Gerahty and Burke gave the government new and detailed information about Glaxo's nationwide improper marketing practices, including the use of financial inducements to doctors to prescribe Glaxo's drugs and the promotion of Advair, Wellbutrin, Imitrex, Lamictal, Zofran and Valtrex for off-label, unapproved uses. Unapproved use of prescription drugs can create significant risks to patients, and drug manufacturers are prohibited by federal law from promoting their drugs for unapproved treatments.
As the government investigation progressed, the whistleblowers and their attorneys made a significant difference in particular in the government's case against Glaxo for its off-label marketing of Advair for mild asthma. Gerahty, Burke and Phillips & Cohen devoted substantial effort and time preparing the legal case that helped demonstrate Glaxo improperly marketed Advair as a first-line asthma treatment and for asthma patients previously treated with only a short-acting inhaler.
As a result, Glaxo paid $686 million out of the total settlement to resolve claims involving the off-label marketing of Advair to treat mild asthma - by far the largest amount Glaxo paid to settle any of the civil charges. (See the settlement agreement at www.glaxowhistleblowers.com .)
Kelton and Phillips & Cohen also represented the whistleblower whose qui tam lawsuit against Pfizer alleging the off-label marketing of the prescription painkiller, Bextra, helped the government recover $1.8 billion as part of a record-setting $2.3 billion settlement in 2009.
"The gravity of Glaxo's conduct cannot be overstated," Kelton said. "The company's improper marketing practices extended across a wide range of its prescription drug portfolio. Given what we saw with Glaxo, Pfizer and other pharma companies, it's fair to conclude there has been almost no limit to what pharma companies have done to sell their products."
Read the rest here
More on the massive GSK fine
Here GlaxoSmithKline to pay $3 billion for health fraud.
Here (Reuters) - GlaxoSmithKline Plc has agreed to plead guilty to misdemeanor criminal charges and pay $3 billion to settle the largest case of healthcare fraud in U.S. history.
The settlement includes $1 billion in criminal fines and $2 billion in civil fines in connection with the sale of the drug company's Paxil, Wellbutrin and Avandia products, according to filings in federal court on Monday.
Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Cole said at a news conference in Washington that the settlement "is unprecedented in both size and scope."
Also at Pharmagossip MONDAY, JULY 02, 2012--
GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data--
Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S. History
Global health care giant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) agreed to plead guilty and to pay $3 billion to resolve its criminal and civil liability arising from the company’s unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices, the Justice Department announced today. The resolution is the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history and the largest payment ever by a drug company.
And Pharmalot Biggest Deal Ever: Glaxo Pays $3B For Bad Behavior.
And Seroxat Sufferers Stand Up and Be Counted.
~~
GSK Press Release: CEO Andrew Witty nearly apologizes, but doesn't--uses word "regret" and read to part that says it is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing regarding the sales of certain drugs listed in the lawsuit settlement:
GlaxoSmithKline concludes previously announced agreement in principle to resolve multiple investigations with US Government and numerous states
"Commenting on the agreement, GlaxoSmithKline CEO Sir Andrew Witty said: “Today brings to resolution difficult, long-standing matters for GSK. Whilst these originate in a different era for the company, they cannot and will not be ignored. On behalf of GSK, I want to express our regret and reiterate that we have learnt from the mistakes that were made.
“We are deeply committed to doing everything we can to live up to and exceed the expectations of those we work with and serve. Since I became CEO, we have had a clear priority to ingrain a culture of putting patients first, acting transparently, respecting people inside and outside the organisation and displaying integrity in everything we do.
“In the US, we have taken action at all levels in the company. We have fundamentally changed our procedures for compliance, marketing and selling. When necessary, we have removed employees who have engaged in misconduct. In the last two years, we have reformed the basis on which we pay our sales representatives and we have enhanced our ability to ‘claw back’ remuneration of our senior management.
“We have a vital role to play in bringing innovative medicines to patients and we understand how important it is that our medicines are appropriately promoted to healthcare professionals and that we adhere to the standards rightly expected by the US Government.”
Under the terms of the settlement, GSK will plead guilty to misdemeanor violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act related to certain aspects of the marketing of Paxil for paediatric use and of Wellbutrin for certain uses, and for failure to include information about the initiation or status of certain Avandia studies in Periodic and Annual Reports submitted to FDA.
The civil settlement reached with the Government does not constitute an admission of any liability or wrongdoing in the selling and marketing of Lamictal, Zofran, Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent, Valtrex, Avandia or Advair products, nor in its nominal pricing practices. "
PRESS RELEASE
July 2, 2012, 10:42 a.m. EDT
Whistleblowers played major role in Glaxo case, leading to Glaxo's record settlement
WASHINGTON, July 2, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Two whistleblowers represented by Phillips & Cohen LLP provided the government with overwhelming evidence that was at the heart of the government's case against GlaxoSmithKline GSK +1.34% and the record-setting settlement announced today.
The whistleblowers - Thomas Gerahty, a former senior marketing development manager for Glaxo, and Matthew Burke, a former regional vice president -- provided invaluable insider information that Glaxo was engaging in corrupt nationwide schemes to push sales of Advair, Wellbutrin, Imitrex and other popular prescription drugs for "off-label" (unapproved) uses, that it used improper financial inducements to market its drugs, and that it misrepresented the safety and efficacy of those drugs. Glaxo's illegal practices caused Medicare, Tricare - the healthcare program for the military -- and Medicaid to incur huge losses.
The civil settlement of Gerahty and Burke's whistleblower case and a separate whistleblower lawsuit filed in Colorado total $1.017 billion out of total settlement. It is the largest civil, False Claims Act (whistleblower) settlement on record. (Two other whistleblower lawsuits that alleged another improper practice concerning Advair marketing settled for $25 million, for a total of $1.042 billion paid under the settlement agreement for the four whistleblower cases.)
Gerahty, Burke and Phillips & Cohen worked closely with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston and the Justice Department since they filed their "qui tam" (whistleblower) case in early 2003 in Boston's federal district court.
Gerahty and Burke gave the government new and detailed information about Glaxo's nationwide improper marketing practices, including the use of financial inducements to doctors to prescribe Glaxo's drugs and the promotion of Advair, Wellbutrin, Imitrex, Lamictal, Zofran and Valtrex for off-label, unapproved uses. Unapproved use of prescription drugs can create significant risks to patients, and drug manufacturers are prohibited by federal law from promoting their drugs for unapproved treatments.
As the government investigation progressed, the whistleblowers and their attorneys made a significant difference in particular in the government's case against Glaxo for its off-label marketing of Advair for mild asthma. Gerahty, Burke and Phillips & Cohen devoted substantial effort and time preparing the legal case that helped demonstrate Glaxo improperly marketed Advair as a first-line asthma treatment and for asthma patients previously treated with only a short-acting inhaler.
As a result, Glaxo paid $686 million out of the total settlement to resolve claims involving the off-label marketing of Advair to treat mild asthma - by far the largest amount Glaxo paid to settle any of the civil charges. (See the settlement agreement at www.glaxowhistleblowers.com .)
Kelton and Phillips & Cohen also represented the whistleblower whose qui tam lawsuit against Pfizer alleging the off-label marketing of the prescription painkiller, Bextra, helped the government recover $1.8 billion as part of a record-setting $2.3 billion settlement in 2009.
"The gravity of Glaxo's conduct cannot be overstated," Kelton said. "The company's improper marketing practices extended across a wide range of its prescription drug portfolio. Given what we saw with Glaxo, Pfizer and other pharma companies, it's fair to conclude there has been almost no limit to what pharma companies have done to sell their products."
Read the rest here
More on the massive GSK fine
Here GlaxoSmithKline to pay $3 billion for health fraud.
Here (Reuters) - GlaxoSmithKline Plc has agreed to plead guilty to misdemeanor criminal charges and pay $3 billion to settle the largest case of healthcare fraud in U.S. history.
The settlement includes $1 billion in criminal fines and $2 billion in civil fines in connection with the sale of the drug company's Paxil, Wellbutrin and Avandia products, according to filings in federal court on Monday.
Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Cole said at a news conference in Washington that the settlement "is unprecedented in both size and scope."
Also at Pharmagossip MONDAY, JULY 02, 2012--
GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data--
Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S. History
Global health care giant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) agreed to plead guilty and to pay $3 billion to resolve its criminal and civil liability arising from the company’s unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices, the Justice Department announced today. The resolution is the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history and the largest payment ever by a drug company.
And Pharmalot Biggest Deal Ever: Glaxo Pays $3B For Bad Behavior.
And Seroxat Sufferers Stand Up and Be Counted.
~~
GSK Press Release: CEO Andrew Witty nearly apologizes, but doesn't--uses word "regret" and read to part that says it is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing regarding the sales of certain drugs listed in the lawsuit settlement:
GlaxoSmithKline concludes previously announced agreement in principle to resolve multiple investigations with US Government and numerous states
"Commenting on the agreement, GlaxoSmithKline CEO Sir Andrew Witty said: “Today brings to resolution difficult, long-standing matters for GSK. Whilst these originate in a different era for the company, they cannot and will not be ignored. On behalf of GSK, I want to express our regret and reiterate that we have learnt from the mistakes that were made.
“We are deeply committed to doing everything we can to live up to and exceed the expectations of those we work with and serve. Since I became CEO, we have had a clear priority to ingrain a culture of putting patients first, acting transparently, respecting people inside and outside the organisation and displaying integrity in everything we do.
“In the US, we have taken action at all levels in the company. We have fundamentally changed our procedures for compliance, marketing and selling. When necessary, we have removed employees who have engaged in misconduct. In the last two years, we have reformed the basis on which we pay our sales representatives and we have enhanced our ability to ‘claw back’ remuneration of our senior management.
“We have a vital role to play in bringing innovative medicines to patients and we understand how important it is that our medicines are appropriately promoted to healthcare professionals and that we adhere to the standards rightly expected by the US Government.”
Under the terms of the settlement, GSK will plead guilty to misdemeanor violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act related to certain aspects of the marketing of Paxil for paediatric use and of Wellbutrin for certain uses, and for failure to include information about the initiation or status of certain Avandia studies in Periodic and Annual Reports submitted to FDA.
The civil settlement reached with the Government does not constitute an admission of any liability or wrongdoing in the selling and marketing of Lamictal, Zofran, Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent, Valtrex, Avandia or Advair products, nor in its nominal pricing practices. "
Kaydol:
Kayıtlar (Atom)